Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you to my colleague.
I didn't have time in the last round, so I do want to get to Mr. Judd with my questions here.
I was actually familiar with your report when I was a member of NSICOP. Obviously, we can't discuss that here in this forum.
I just want to clarify, with respect to an earlier question, the mandate of your role. Can you explain further? It's my understanding that the reason the intelligence wouldn't have been provided to you was that the mandate of your role was to review the process. It's not about individual instances. You weren't auditing, let's say, the process the last time, but you were reviewing the process itself. In that, did you look at the pre-writ question of having this process in place for foreign interference activity during elections?