My first question, Madam Chair, has to do with—and I know it's been talked about—the relationship between members of the House and the Senate and the ongoing work in the working groups, but I know that at the beginning of this discussion in the last Parliament, where I was on PROC as well, we raised some concern with respect to the fact that senators in particular, with whom we will be sharing the building, have a better continuity than members of the House in view of the fact they don't have to get elected.
I know for a fact that the three members from the Conservatives who sit on this committee weren't here in the last Parliament, so we start to lose this continuity. I hate to say this, and I mean it with all due respect, but there comes to be a bit of territorialism around the building and what aspects of the building are used by the Senate and what is used by members of the House. I'm curious as to how you can preserve.... For example, in the last session I received a massive binder with all these pages—you sent it to my house, I think, at the beginning of the pandemic—and I sat there for a couple of hours looking at the diagrams and everything. I don't know if other members have received that, the newer members of this committee who weren't on the last one...?
They haven't, so this continuity is immediately lost, and I think it's very important to preserve that. If this is going to go on for another 10 years, I'm just curious about how you're preserving that for the membership of this committee, because it's going to change a lot more frequently than the Senate membership that's overseeing this.