I have concerns regarding this motion, since there could be a series of changes. The document with Mr. Cooper’s amendments in red and black has been distributed by the clerk.
First, Ms. Normandin moved that paragraph (a) be removed, and we are now coming back to the text before us, that is, the original wording proposed by Mr. Julian. In the second part, he is proposing to change Mr. Cooper’s amendment by removing the word “all”. Once again, it may be better for Mr. Julian to propose all his amendments together, so that we can have a complete picture.
I understand why he wants to proceed like this, to obtain unanimous consent for each element. I understand, but it is confusing.