If you'll forgive me, I think the question is for someone other than us.
Let me take the opportunity, if I may, to make a couple of points. The information that eventually flows to the panel is about what's going on in the public domain, to which many people have access. We have institutions that are reviewing it, assessing it and providing advice to the panel.
We also have lots of other people who are seeing what is going on in, say, social media. It is entirely open to other individuals or institutions, be they civil society organizations, some of which take on the responsibility of election oversight, or the intelligence institutions for that matter, which have in their own remits the capacity to say something about it.
I think that putting this in the realm of the panel itself as the sole source of valid information is not appropriate.