I think that's the first question.... I don't know that it is his first question, but probably the first question the special rapporteur needs to answer before he is able to answer what a mandate should look like is what the mechanism should look like. What is the question we're trying to answer? What are we trying to satisfy here? What is the moment at which we're trying to meet with Canadians here that can give them the satisfaction we all want them to have in their democratic institutions? What's the best way to do that?
First we have to figure that out, and then we figure out a mandate. If those things can already be happening or are already happening through other means and the spotlight just hasn't been shone on them, then perhaps, to my previous answer to a different question, that's something we need to think about.
I think there's a lot more to think about here than a binary choice—inquiry or no inquiry. That's hopefully what is now happening. Actually, I'm certain it is.