Thank you for your question.
I'd like to make two points. First, the process is indeed being questioned. A map was proposed, but people weren't then given an opportunity to provide feedback. Subsequently, a completely different map was proposed, without residents having any opportunity to speak to the people making the decisions. There's a problem with that process.
Second, in regard to your question about the criteria, I think it's very important for communities of interest to stay together. It's also important to take municipal boundaries into account. It's incredibly difficult for a member to represent the residents of two different cities, when you're talking about big cities like Vancouver and Richmond. They are totally different. They each have their own mayor and city council. That makes things very difficult, not only for constituents, but also for the member, who then has to work with two city councils and two governments.
I think it's necessary to consider changing the process and steps, as well as the rules and criteria.