I read the letter that this gentleman wrote to the Globe and Mail. In fact, when you read his letter, you see that he says he is disappointed at what is happening, because it is not what he wanted.
I can't support doing this kind of thing. When there are internal discussions about intelligence, even if you are in a senior position, you accept that you will face opposition. There are ways to have these discussions.
One thing makes me very afraid when it comes to our need to refine our measures. When we get to the bottom of the matter, if we see, as a lot of people have said so far, that there were really no grounds for taking measures, is it going to tarnish the reputation of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service or the agency where the leak is coming from—we don't actually know where it is coming from—or of the security and intelligence community generally? Is it going to make it even harder to give them access to the tools they need?
We have to recall how the Canadian Security Intelligence Service was created, in 1984, and everything that came with it. That created constraints.
I will be able to talk more about it later.