Thank you.
Mr. Bordeleau, we have addressed the question of the threshold beyond which information about attempted interference must be made public. What we are hearing about this gives us the impression that it is a binary thing: either the threshold has been crossed or it hasn't.
Could there not instead be a kind of gradation, or different levels? For example, for a more limited attack or interference, we would give the public somewhat more generic information. However, if something very concrete happened and involved a very high risk, we would give the public much more specific information about the type of interference in issue. Should this threshold have different levels?