On the first point, yes, I think if we considered lowering the voting age at the same time as there was a vigorous civics education process, you'd be getting people when they are still in school and when they have the day to learn. My daughter is nine. She told me how much she wishes she was doing more civics in school. Of course, I was so excited to hear that.
I think there is a lot of value and opportunity there. I understand that education is a provincial jurisdiction and that there would be all kinds of issues, but I honestly think we could pull that off.
The other thing is that, from a teenager's perspective, you have a different view in terms of being forward-looking. You have a different idea about the long term and about trying to make decisions that will make sure that the planet is a good place for you. You're thinking long-term about things. You actually do have, in many ways, a very different type of vantage point on the sorts of questions we are asking ourselves.
It doesn't mean that people who are younger have different priorities. When it comes to climate change and the cost of living, I think we see a lot of overlap across ages, depending on who we ask. However, I think it would be a different perspective sometimes, because there's this sense that you're in this for the long haul. It's very much a perspective that's worth gathering and that's very important to gather.