That's an excellent question.
There are different techniques. Foreign interference comes from a wide range of different fields. It comes from finance, from information, as we've talked about, and there are plenty of other potential techniques. That's why, when it comes to what information needs to be made available to the public, I don't think I can answer that question fully. I think only experts in those specific techniques and those specific fields would be able to do that.
In terms of information, which is something I can speak about, I will say this and I've said it before: It needs to be clear. In the case of Australia, for instance, when they make information regarding foreign interference in elections public, they talk very specifically about investigations that have concluded and are not ongoing. Right here, we are addressing the fact that this isn't going to compromise national security because these are investigations that have been terminated.
The information is also very clear in saying that X did Y with the objective of achieving “this”. The information and the objectives of the agent are made very clear. This is the best way to approach the topic.