All right.
Finally, did these debates last more than two hours? Did people take the time to properly unpack the issue to understand the causes or to understand the reasons why the conclusion was reached that there had been no conflict of interest?
When it comes to what activities we are and are not allowed to do outside of our work, is there a way to sort that out?
What would help us distinguish between things we can do and things we shouldn't do? Is there a trick to making sure we don't cross that line?