Madam Chair, I think the issue that Mr. Duncan raises has a lot to do with how you define your role, really, as a member of Parliament. The code of conduct is meant to guide you as to what might be seen to be acceptable from the public view in terms of behaviour. However, it should not really ever be seen as a vehicle that actually prevents you from doing your job, keeps you from doing it in terms of why you wanted to be a member of Parliament. If it goes that far, then it has really crossed a line that actually neutralizes you in your capacity to function as a member. You have your duties in Parliament and in the chamber, and in the committees and in your caucus, but you also have significantly important duties with respect to your electors. If you can't do the work for them, you might start asking yourself why you're here.
From that point of view, there has to be a dialogue with the commissioner so they fully and properly understand what the nature of your work is.
I don't want to end my comments without acknowledging Mr. Vis, who I knew when I was on the other side and met him as a parliamentary intern.