My concern is that the CRA is not enforcing the law requiring that charities stick to activities that are exclusively charitable. The example I was trying to illustrate was of a Canadian funded via a Canadian charity, who was providing information to the Chinese government about what's going on in former Soviet countries. That's not charitable activity.
If you read the revocation reports that are coming out, there are some very concerning activities the CRA is revealing.
It's the nature of the activities that are being conducted that's a concern, number one.
Second is the delay. When it's taking 10 years to shut down an errant charity, that's too long.
I could go on. It's the nature of the types of activities occurring that's a concern, and the other is—