Thank you. I think that's exactly the procedure that should be undertaken.
Parliament has the unfettered right to call for the production of documents and for witnesses. I remember when a witness—one Karlheinz Schreiber—had to be released from the custody of Her Majesty in right of the Province of Ontario from, I believe, the Mimico correctional facility because the Speaker had issued a warrant, I believe, for this individual to appear in front of a committee.
Parliament has always had the unfettered right to call for the production of documents and for individuals. In this case, I think the government should provide documents, under lock and key, to the parliamentary law clerk, who would then, in consultation with government officials, make the decision about redactions of anything that would be injurious to national security in order to protect national security. I think that's an appropriate process to follow.
If NSICOP were ever to be brought into Parliament, it would be a good procedure for Parliament to follow. It's one that was recommended by former law clerk Dufresne, and I think it's a good process to follow.