—wondering why I'm more than a little bit hesitant on that process.
It is around information security. We're talking about highly classified documents. We have obligations in terms of protecting the information, and I think we need to be as robust in the protection of that information as possible, which is one of the reasons that—much like my colleague—I believe, fundamentally, that there are institutions in Canada that can independently look at this information in as transparent a way as possible, that have both the physical means to do so in terms of safe, secure rooms as well as the technology to do so.
I have yet to experience that level of security for highly classified documents when it comes to this place, I'm sorry to say. I'm happy to be proven wrong, but again, in terms of my job, which was always managing risk, I think that, in terms of protection of the information, it is too high a risk.
Again, I think an inquiry that has the individuals and the facilities to appropriately handle the information is the right way to go. I understand that lots of committees are looking at it, but my preference, from a security perspective, is that inquiry process, because it has the means to manage that information.