That's the point. It looks to me—I mean, I wasn't part of the process—like the service was sending these reports routinely for quite some time and that there's an expectation that the policy-makers or the machinery of government have a strategy to deal with PRC foreign interference and would incorporate that into their decision. That's the whole point.
It's not hitting tripwires like terrorism and espionage, but it is hitting tripwires. If there's a certain lethargy with government in terms of receiving the reporting, it's not a surprise to me, when it starts getting a little more serious with respect to an MP, that there's nobody home. It goes to culture, which my colleague mentioned earlier. There simply may be a culture where they don't respond to the reporting, but CSIS isn't waiting by the phone. They're just continually putting this out as part of the intelligence production process.