Ultimately, if the answers were going to come from cabinet confidences or that type of email exchange, it would. I'm aware of the fact that there's a sensitivity, and that's why I'm saying, with a public inquiry, you can still have those in camera discussions or exchanges with the commissioner. There are no lawyers or anyone there. They can just review it and get some answers.
It's not an either-or thing. We either have a public inquiry and we can't talk about classified matters at all, which means it's going to be pointless, or we just stick with the regular institutions we have to review it and then the public says, “How do we know it was reviewed?” That's why, in my opinion, it's a public inquiry.
You can put all sorts of safeguards on public inquiries. It just takes a bit of creativity. It's all legal. It's been done before.