When you look at inquiries, for example, the John Major inquiry, you talk about security and sensitivity of information. There were surveillance questions. There were intelligence officers, deputy ministers and former ambassadors. There was a whole smorgasbord of people who were questioned.
When I look at the nature of this investigation—and I've worked this area for years, most of my career is in counter-intelligence—foreign interference is what we refer to as low-hanging fruit. This isn't an espionage ring. This isn't of great sensitivity. I'm not understating it. I'll probably have former colleagues ask me what I'm doing, but it's not that sensitive.
It's already out that CSIS uses interviews, and it's in the media that CSIS listens to phones of targets, so there's not going to be that much coming out that's going to shake western civilization—not to be facetious. That's why I say that, if we want to have an inquiry, it's probably the safest one in terms of national security to have on this type of operation.