Thank you very much.
Once again, I'm going to put a question to both witnesses, but perhaps Mr. Wark could answer it first.
One of the reasons we've been given for not proceeding with an independent public inquiry is the delicate nature of the intelligence that might be revealed. However, witnesses told us this morning that, in a foreign interference setting, these are relatively easy problems to solve and that this intelligence may be less sensitive than that associated with spying cases, for example.
I'd like to know how sensitive the information on the foreign interference issue is compared to information on the inquiry into the bombing of Air India flight 182 or the Maher Arar inquiry.
In this context, if we attach too much importance to the national security issue, don't we risk classifying too much intelligence as secret and preventing the public from accessing enough information to gain a little clarity?