Thank you very much.
I'd like to go back to you, Ms. McCuaig‑Johnston.
You mentioned in your opening statement that, despite your respect for Mr. Johnston, you were nevertheless somewhat disappointed that he hadn't recommended a public inquiry. Then, in your answers—correct me if I misquote you—you suggest that his analysis of the information he had received and his report led you to believe that he might somehow lack knowledge about China and that he also wasn't an intelligence expert.
In that context, I'd like to hear what you have to say about the next steps. Since Mr. Johnston will continue holding the reins on this issue and will conduct public hearings, do you consider him an appropriate person to occupy that position, compared to someone who has received the approval of all parliamentarians in the House, for example, and who might have different competencies?