I agree with what Mr. Wark said.
I will simply repeat remarks that I made earlier in my presentation and that I've made several times in the media in recent weeks. I'm don't really find the argument against conducting an independent public inquiry, which is that it would reveal too much sensitive information, very convincing. It's possible to conduct a public inquiry even if important information remains secret. Conclusions may be disclosed. As mentioned earlier, some aspects of communication with the public are very important.
In my view, the strongest argument is that conducting a public inquiry would actually add little value. I think that many of the people in favour of holding a public inquiry overestimate the potential benefits of such an exercise and underestimate the contribution that can be made by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, the NSICOP, the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency, the NSIRA, and other agencies. I don't think it would make much of a difference.