Thank you. I agree with your sentiment.
Ms. Dawson, maybe I could go to you on this. I know you said in your remarks, which I read through, that the general practice within your office, when you were the commissioner, was to consider $30 gifts as being ones that would not have any influence over a member. I still have trouble understanding why $30, why $50—why no gifts at all? To me, on most of these things, the true test, is it not, is to...?
I mean, what is the actual likelihood of that influencing a member of Parliament's fulfillment of their duties? I don't see how $30 versus $50 versus $200 would make that much of a difference, to be honest.
Could you comment on that, through the chair?