Thank you. Again, I'm hoping you will also address how those families will feel safe to come forward or how those individuals will feel safe to come forward.
In my second question, I want to touch on how you identified the serious shortcomings in communication between security agencies and the government. You made it clear that there were “no examples...of Ministers, the Prime Minister or their offices knowingly or negligently failing to act on intelligence, advice or recommendations.” So it is conceivable, in your report, that the ministers or the Prime Minister were not properly informed. However, you also recognize in your conclusion that it is very clear that foreign governments are absolutely or undoubtedly attempting to interfere in our democracy and that this is something that's been well known.
Given how clear it is that there is foreign interference going on and that the government ought to have known that, generally speaking, there is foreign interference going on, my question is about the utter lack of curiosity of this government. Despite clear and credible evidence of foreign interference, in your investigation, at no point in time did the Prime Minister or ministers ever actively or proactively ask CSIS or other security agencies whether or not members of Parliament were being targeted.
Was there never an attempt to proactively assess threats to members of Parliament? While you accept that they were not maybe advised of this by CSIS, did they never have the curiosity to say that if we know there's foreign interference going on, maybe it's impacting our members of Parliament? Was there never any evidence of that curiosity and interest in following up?