Madam Chair, if we go back to my introductory statement, I think it's important to note that I tried to suggest that long intelligence assessments...and according to The Globe and Mail, this assessment was nine pages long and mentioned a great number of areas in which China may be trying to interfere in Canada's democracy. Jody Thomas characterized such assessments as—I forget her exact term—nice to read, but not necessary to read instantly, or something like that.
The larger point is that such an assessment is designed to raise awareness within the community.
I was also clear in making a second point, which was that readers of such assessments, which do not include names and which did not include Michael Chong's name, can safely assume that if it shows up in a periodic assessment, the relevant actions have been taken. I made the distinction between something that appears on the front page as a breaking news story and something that appears in a deep dive.
The July 2021 assessment report was a deep dive, and I stand by my comment that it was not intended, in its own preface, to spur any action. That is made clear by The Globe and Mail reporting on it.