Okay.
I'm going to flip it on its head. I know that you mentioned that when it comes to members of Parliament you work very closely with the Sergeant-at-Arms, the PPS and so on. In this case, Mr. Chong was not made aware of the specifics of the threat until after a news report came out.
What would you say to members of Parliament who may be aware of activities that they are not sure could be considered intimidation tactics? What would you recommend that we do?