Okay.
I just want to go back to Minister Blair's testimony. I think it's just important to put it on record.
On June 1, he said, in specific response to the issue of the IMU concerning MP Chong, “The director determined that this was not information the minister needed to know”.
He further went on to say, “In this case, they”—meaning you—“made an operational decision that...was not required.”
He then added that he was not provided this because of your supposed operational decision, which he characterized as one that was “quite appropriately” made.
How do you explain the minister's testimony? It's not just a case of his not seeing it; he's talking about an operational decision that was made by you that he even went on to say was quite appropriately made, which was to not inform him.