Thank you for that.
Now, there's quite a gap, quite a contrast, really, between what Mr. Johnston concluded, that he couldn't find evidence that the interference was state-sponsored, and what Mr. O'Toole was told by CSIS, which was that Beijing orchestrated a campaign that included misinformation, using, among other things, state social media accounts. That was also contained in a rapid-response mechanism report that, frankly, Mr. Johnston should have seen and couldn't explain how he hadn't seen when he concluded, as he did, that he couldn't find evidence that the interference was tied to the Beijing regime.
Mr. Johnston, as you also alluded to, stated in answer that he based his conclusions on the intelligence that he had. Are you suggesting that Mr. Johnston wasn't provided all relevant evidence and intelligence, or do you know?