Madam Chair, I want to follow up with Mr. Jean on my last question.
Mr. Johnston's report said that one of the earlier drafts of the 2017 memo referred to or contained similar language to what was in Global News. There was language to the effect of Beijing agents assisting Canadian candidates running for political offices. You said that you didn't see that particular draft of the memo, as I understood you.
Mr. Johnston, then, in his report stated that it was revised:
This memorandum warns him—
—him, being the Prime Minister—
—that public efforts to raise awareness should remain general and not single out specific countries, because of diplomatic sensitivities.
I ask you again, why was the decision made not to, for example, identify or point out the threat posed by Beijing? Why was the language changed?