I think it did. I will attempt to answer on my views there.
On the RRM itself, again, as I've said a few times, I think there are various tools. We have to use all the tools as designed. There are always ways in which we can improve the tools, but then we have to complement them with other efforts. The RRM is a very tactical team in terms of understanding that information environment. It's a particular skill set to do what I've described. I think that needs to be protected, with an ability to share with allies, academics and researchers about what we're seeing so that we can increase our understanding in complement.
Then a full spectrum of effort needs to take place. Another part under my responsibilities is the digital inclusion lab, which then works on, as I mentioned briefly, the declaration on information integrity. This is where you're taking a combination of operational lessons that we may be learning and some of our other policy work on protecting human rights online and off-line. Then we look at what the opportunities are and where we can advance that internationally.
There is a full spectrum of tools. It's not necessarily the RRM, I would say, but are we looking at that? Absolutely. The declaration on information integrity is actually an excellent example of that. We're working with other governments to identify the various mechanisms we could use and the various approaches. With that type of declaration we ask countries to sign on. Currently, 30 countries have signed on. One of those commitments is for countries to abstain from and condemn state-led disinformation campaigns. It also invites private sector companies and industry to enhance transparency in advertising, algorithms and content moderation.
We have to use everything at our disposal to address this. Those would be some tools within Global Affairs, but there are also a lot of other actors in this space.