Thank you. I appreciate that.
I want to build on your comments.
You had a chance to talk about Mr. Rosenberg's report. You said earlier it was almost professional negligence when it came to not interviewing you or officials from the Conservative Party of Canada.
In your willingness to try to address this issue in a serious manner, I want you to elaborate a bit more on the rapporteur, Mr. Johnston, who was doing his report. You had some frustrations, so I want you to elaborate on those frustrations.
Am I correct in stating that whenever you met with him, he advised you that the report was already written and had been sent to translation? When you talked about the negligence, you weren't interviewed by Mr. Rosenberg at all, and then when you were interviewed by Mr. Johnston, it was just as bad. It was already shipped off.
Can you elaborate on that and what happened in that circumstance, and whether that was inappropriate or not?