Yes, and you are right. On page 4 of the Rosenberg report, Mr. Rosenberg states, “There was an opportunity to meet with representatives of major political parties”. “Opportunity” doesn't necessarily mean that meetings actually took place.
Further to that, he stated, at page 39, “The party representatives were pleased with the thoroughness of the briefings and the openness of the [national security] representatives.” That doesn't sound like your experience. How in the world could he come to that conclusion if he didn't talk to you and he didn't talk to your representative on the committee? It sounds like Mr. Rosenberg was being less than forthcoming and honest in his conclusions with respect to feedback he received.