Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'm glad, actually, to speak about this again because, as I have done so before at this committee, I've had an opportunity to speak about how reckless Conservatives are on matters of national security and, once again, we have another opportunity.
What we're discussing here today is an amendment to remove a section in terms of documents that the Conservatives are requesting, documents that the previous two speakers just acknowledged were of national security classification, and that they believe should be open to the public, and the public also consists of China and other foreign adversaries that would love to have our national security information. The opportunity, they said The Globe and Mail looked at some of this information and therefore they should too.
They believe that leaks of national security are a good way of securing our country, I guess. There were opportunities for all party leaders to see all of the relevant information, but it was only the Conservative leader who chose not to get the appropriate security clearance. What this means is that Conservatives don't want to handle documents of national security significance with the appropriate controls. They'd like that information to be available to Russia, to China and to whatever other adversary—