Thank you, Madam Chair.
I am always happy to sit with my colleagues on the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
I want to thank you for going over what has happened. I was, unfortunately, unable to be here last Thursday.
It's tough to follow my colleagues because I'm in sort of the same vein.
Obviously, my question with respect to paragraph (a) is this: What's the goal here? If the goal is that we feel that there is documentation that was requested that has not been received and that we would like to receive before proceeding with the report, I'm fine with that.
Obviously, premising a statement with inflammatory language—taking potshots at the Prime Minister's Office, at the Liberal Party and so on—is not going to get us to where we need to be. No member of Parliament would support using inflammatory language.
If the goal is to get the documents that are outstanding—if there are, in fact, documents outstanding, and it's not clear to me that there are—I would support something along those lines. If it's something that will be helpful in terms of determining whether or not Mr. Chong's privilege was, in fact, breached, I'd welcome that.
I think I'd like to get some clarity from the clerk as to whether there are any items outstanding because if there are no items outstanding, I think that this is a moot point that we're having a discussion about.
I don't know if it would be possible for the clerk to give us an update on whether or not any documents are outstanding and, if so, what those would look like. We might be having a conversation for the sake of having a great conversation, but maybe we have already received everything. I'm not sure.