I'll just answer that.
After a quick conversation with the clerk, I can say that, basically, witnesses who came would have undertaken to provide documents. I remember that word “undertake” very clearly, and it was repeated.
There was no list being created by the clerk to actually know what was owing, because you would think that if a witness came and undertook to provide documents, they would be provided to us in a timely way.
In that sense, that's where I think this conversation is relevant. We could go to see, or if we know what documents we think are outstanding that are not being referred to, then we can know. However, we would all know the witnesses who came. We would all know what we asked them to provide, depending on who asked them to provide it, so we would be able to get that information. We would know because if somebody was offering me information and I did not receive it—because it would be in our digital binder—I would then be able to say, “Hey, I've not seen this document. Can we follow up?” The clerk would be more than willing to do that. I think it's just sometimes a matter of reminding them.