The motion clearly states that the incident was serious enough because it undermines the trust of the House.
You said several times that you had found no precedents, although you may have come across similar situations that had occurred in other legislative assemblies, but never in the Parliament of Canada. Personally, I think that's because this serious incident reveals a major lack of judgment.
Does that mean that our recommendations and study will become a precedent? Will the decision we make at the end of our study become jurisprudence?