I have just a couple of questions, and I want to clarify something for Mr. Albrecht.
I know Mr. D'Amours has been opposed to any type of movement in that direction, as he believes they would like to try to find other jobs for other things in the areas they're in. That's just to clarify things in terms of where he's been--and Ms. Bonsant as well.
In terms of immigration, I'm personally very frustrated in terms of the slowness with which government works, period, in terms of being able to transition. We had someone sitting in your spot earlier, Mr. Maynard, and they talked about the policy of mandatory retirement for those aged 65 and how archaic that is in terms of when that was put in place. The fact is that it hasn't been in place for thirty years in the U.S. It hasn't been there in places like Australia for ten to fifteen years.
We've certainly talked to the immigration minister and we've talked to HR, and I know these are concerns. If we look at all these things, I think every presenter today mentioned them as important. It was almost unanimous.
I don't know if I misunderstood, but did you say that some of these measures that we talked about, whether it was older workers or immigration, were temporary measures? Are these issues going to address the concerns in the coming years, or do you look at immigration policy, if it's changed, as being a way to fix this, as a solution for the long term?
Two or three can comment on that.