I realize that. You made the effort to testify before the committee because you felt this bill posed a threat to banks. Yet, only 1% of banking sector employees are unionized.
How does this bill pose a threat to them, given the low unionization rate in the banking sector? After all, only unionized employees go on strike. I'd appreciate a succinct, objective answer to my question.
You stated that this bill posed a threat to banks, but you also said that should a dispute arise, a minimum level of service needed to be maintained. Are you saying then that should a dispute arise, you don't expect, or don't necessarily want to have all of the workers on the job?