No, that's not what I said. I said that I understand each airport will have a different operating certificate in accordance with the services it provides. But this is what I want to know: in the past, when a regional airport got a federal certificate it was able, with just a few employees, to provide an aircraft ambulance service. They managed to do this with just a few employees and a short runway. Why can't airports like the ones you represent make sure there are enough employees to provide the necessary emergency services?
A bit later, if I have any time left, I'll come back to Mr. Giroux's interpretation of section 87.4. I'd be interested in hearing what ever reading you've made of it. But I've interpreted it differently because the word “prevent” is used. You don't need to wait for an emergency to take steps. You can also take preventative action, in other words, take the necessary steps to prevent such an emergency from occurring. Prevention means taking action ahead of time, and not waiting for an emergency to occur. Now, in the case of an airport, you'll be able to ensure that planes, and in some cases helicopters, will be able to land to provide emergency health care. So I don't understand why some airports in Canada manage, and others don't.