I don't understand your ruling, Mr. Chair.
The agenda that we received, and that I have before me, states that we're conducting clause-by-clause consideration. Then it mentions each of the clauses: clauses 1, 2, 3. Then there are questions such as: shall the bill carry as amended, and so on.
Earlier, when my colleague Yves Lessard introduced the motion saying that we wanted to return to clause-by-clause consideration, that concerned all the clauses. He never said it only concerned clause 1.
You never said that, did you, Mr. Lessard?