I'd like to go back to retroactivity because something is troubling me on that subject. You said that there were 11 months of retroactivity and that that wasn't done elsewhere, that there was no retroactivity.
Are we talking about the same thing? I wouldn't want to be comparing apples and bananas. When you owe someone money and you grant that person retroactivity, that's an amount owed; it's not a favour or a privilege. I was wondering why full retroactivity isn't granted to people who are entitled to the Guaranteed Income Supplement.