I'd be happy to do that, Madam Chair.
This is basically how you define someone as a low-income person. Is my honourable colleague Mr. Epp really saying that a person...? Let's say a person is 50 and they have a very low income. They're ready and they want to go back to university to get an education so that they can improve their lot in life. Should there be no assistance for them to do so? Should we exclude them because of the fact that they're 50?