Thank you.
I have a question about this whole clause whose deletion is being proposed, and I think it's germane to the debate here. The way I understand this, it says students would be qualified for a grant if they're a “person in respect of whom a national child benefit supplement, or a special allowance under the Children’s Special Allowances Act, is payable”. We're dealing here with people who are in elementary or high school; otherwise, they wouldn't be eligible for this. It continues, “is payable or would be payable if the person was less than eighteen years of age”.
If you have a 50-year-old, would they be eligible? To me, this is terribly ambiguous. I don't know. I don't understand why that criterion would come in there at all. I would like to have Mr. Regan comment on that if he can.