—so maybe you could accuse me of that. But I am reading separate minutes from separate committees. I know it sounds very redundant, because it's pretty similar to the motion we have before us.
I lost my spot there, so maybe I'll start at the beginning again on this one. This is from the industry committee. It says:
That the Committee recommend to the government, in view of the serious crisis in the forestry and manufacturing sectors, that it implement without delay an improved assistance plan for the forestry and manufacturing sectors, including $500 million to restore Technology Partnerships Canada; $1.5 billion in reimbursable contributions to allow companies to purchase new equipment; a $1 billion diversification fund for the forestry industry, to be administered by Quebec and the provinces and allocated among them based according to the size of their forestry industry; and that the adoption of this motion be reported to the House at the earliest opportunity.
This one sounds almost identical to the finance motion, which I will read, actually, because it is interesting that they are almost identical.
The finance motion is the one that was voted down, including by three Liberal members who voted against it and seemed to actually have the interest of Canadians in mind in getting down to the work of the committee. The motion that was moved there was: “That the Committee recommend”--