It's interesting that one of the Liberal members is trying to correct me in talking about the word “may”, but I'll point out that this actually follows the same wording as is in the act now, so it's no change to the act.
There is a backstop. The fact is that if we have this reserve of $2 billion, if for some reason there's a deficit of more than $2 billion, under this legislation the government will cover that and workers will not be penalized. There may be a slight increase in rates to cover circumstances as need be, and there might be a slight falling in rates if we're collecting more money than we need to collect, based on mathematical formulas that are pretty much exactly the same as they are right now.
So Mr. Blakely, if you could, I'd like to have you comment on that. Does that allay a little bit of your concern?