First of all, I fully agree with Mr. Martin. To my knowledge, we have never had a problem with that.
Unless I am mistaken, because I don't have the French version, what I think we are removing here, from the text I have in front of me which was our previous motion, are the words: “unless there is unanimous consent“.
That provision enabled the committee to make the necessary arrangements, based on the reality of the situation. So I don't see why we would remove it, nor why we would change something that is working well.
I understand that the situation may have caused problems or difficulties on other committees and that there is a desire to introduce that motion here. Mr. Komarnicki's motion may be relevant one day, but for the time being, I don't see the need for trying to bring everything that seems to work best at other committees here.