I think, if I understand your question correctly, that in the present case we can certainly look at the 2008 report, the monitoring and assessment report. We can look at benefits paid and we can see exactly how many benefits were paid for sickness, compassion, and maternity and parental. We can certainly decide what share of total costs went towards that and what share exactly went to regular benefits.
So there is no problem there. Where we do need to make the connection, as I was talking about earlier, is what premiums went to what? When somebody pays the current rate of $1.73, we don't say, okay, this share is going for that and this share is going for that. When you're making projections on the other system, you can't earmark one piece for this and one for that.