Let me respond to what Ed said a while ago following my intervention, which is, what am I talking about here? What do I need in order to have some assurance that we don't need an amendment like this?
I don't have to work out 100% of the details now, but if the parliamentary secretary gives me his assurance that the government will support a motion asking the Auditor General to have a complete look at Bill C-56 to assure its actuarial soundness, in particular looking at how rates are set and its impact on the EI fund, I'd be prepared to move this bill through tonight without material change to it. I don't have to have the exact working. We have the blues here.
Is that something we can agree on and have a look at?