I understand my colleague's argument very well. It is a good one in itself, but I think that before voting we need to answer the questions and how the situation as it is, with the real facts.
I totally support what my colleague Yves Lessard about the constitutionality of this bill. We think this is fundamental. There are parts of this that are fundamental. For example, why does it say "Quebec" and not "all provinces"? If we don't adopt clause 3.1, we will not go any further, because the Bloc Québécois considers the bill to be unacceptable.
It is therefore fundamental to spend a bit more time studying this clause before moving on to the others. In fact, we will not consider them if clause 3.1 is not adopted.