Mr. Chair, a point of order. The decision has been made and we don't need to talk about it now. If he says today that it is an entertaining decision, Mr. Chair, he only has to appeal your decision. He doesn't need to talk about it, he just needs to appeal it. That is not what the debate is about, it is about the substance.
Do we agree on the Bloc Québécois amendment concerning clause 3.1, yes or no?