That hasn't been resolved to date. The legislation or the bill that's brought forward is targeted to a very few situations. I think we all agree on this. This is not something that is going to occur every week. Let's hope not, anyway.
I guess the point, based on that one example of the situation in Montreal we just spoke of, is that this bill may not provide much help for them. I'm just wondering, when we look at extending the qualifying period to 104, why the bill doesn't extend it to 1,004. I'm just curious. I just wonder what your thoughts are on that.
Obviously, it's very specific. It's very targeted. Yet we see one case here where possibly this bill won't help those people this bill is trying to help. I'm just wondering if any of you could give me some insight on that, because it seems to me that a bill is being put before the committee that may already fail the people it's trying to help. I'm just trying to get an understanding of that, please.